Current Practices in Midline Laparotomy Closure: Results of a Portuguese National Survey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.1169Keywords:
Abdominal Wound Closure Techniques, Incisional Hernia, Laparotomy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Suture TechniquesAbstract
Introduction: Incisional hernias after midline laparotomy significantly affect quality of life and healthcare costs. Adequate fascial closure, including evidence-based suture techniques and the use of prophylactic mesh in selected patients, is essential for prevention. This study aimed to evaluate current abdominal wall closure practices in Portugal.
Methods: A 26-question online national survey was conducted and shared through surgical societies, email lists, and social media. The questionnaire addressed surgeon demographics, suture materials, closure techniques, prophylactic mesh use, and abdominal wall practices related to stoma creation and emergency settings.
Results: A total of 233 surgeons completed the survey (31.2% residents; 68.8% consultants). Long-lasting absorbable sutures were preferred for laparotomy closure (47%) and burst abdomen repair (39.3%). The small-bites technique was known by 94.4% of surgeons, correctly understood by 77.4%, but only 59.8% routinely applied the recommended 4:1 suture length-to-wound length ratio. More than 60% reported never using prophylactic mesh, even during definitive colostomy creation. Techniques for burst abdomen management varied widely.
Conclusion: Abdominal wall closure practices in Portugal remain highly variable, with only partial adherence to guideline-recommended techniques. Key components such as the 4:1 suture length-to-wound length ratio and the selective use of prophylactic mesh—particularly in high-risk patients and during definitive stoma creation—are underutilized. These findings highlight the need for wider guideline dissemination and structured training to promote more uniform, evidence-based practice.
Downloads
References
Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, Chelala E, et al. Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia. 2009;13:407-14. doi:10.1007/s10029-009-0518-x.
Deerenberg EB, Henriksen NA, Antoniou GA, Antoniou SA, Bramer WM, Fischer JP, et al. Updated guideline for closure of abdominal wall incisions from the European and American Hernia Societies. Br J Surg. 2022;109:1239-50. doi:10.1093/bjs/znac302. Erratum in: Br J Surg. 2023;110:287. doi:10.1093/bjs/znac412.
Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW, Lont HE, van Doorn HC, Heisterkamp J, et al. Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386:1254-60. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60459-7.
Fortelny RH, Baumann P, Hofmann A, Riedl S, Kever JL, Hoelderle J, et al. Five-year clinical outcome of the ESTOIH trial comparing the short-bite versus large-bite technique for elective midline abdominal closure. Hernia. 2025;29:263. doi:10.1007/s10029-025-03459-9.
Pereira JA, López-Cano M, Marsal F, Feliu X. Resultados de una encuesta nacional sobre el cierre de la pared abdominal. Cir Esp. 2013;91:645-50. doi:10.1016/j.ciresp.2013.02.001.
Bloemen A, De Kleijn RJ, Van Steensel S, Aarts F, Schreinemacher MH, Bouvy ND. Laparotomy closure techniques: do surgeons follow the latest guidelines? Results of a questionnaire. Int J Surg. 2019;71:110-6. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.09.024.
Stabiliini C, Muysoms FE, Tzanis AA, Rossi L, Koutsiouroumpa O, Mavridis D, et al. EHS rapid guideline: evidence-informed European recommendations on parastomal hernia prevention with ESCP and EAES participation. J Abdom Wall Surg. 2023;2:11549. doi:10.3389/jaws.2023.11549.
Jairam AP, Timmermans L, Eker HH, Pierik RE, van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW, et al. Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;390:567-76. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736.31332-6. Erratum in: Lancet. 2017;390:554.
Frassini S, Cobianchi L, Fugazzola P, Biffi WL, Coccolini F, Damaskos D, et al. ECLAPTE: effective closure of laparotomy in emergency—2023 World Society of Emergency Surgery guidelines for the closure of laparotomy in emergency settings. World J Emerg Surg. 2023;18:42. doi:10.1186/s13017-023-00511-w. Erratum in: World J Emerg Surg. 2023;18:52. doi:10.1186/s13017-023-00522-7.
Israelsson LA, Millbourn D. Prevention of incisional hernias: how to close a midline incision. Surg Clin North Am. 2013;93:1027-40. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2013.06.001.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Portuguese Journal of Surgery
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Para permitir ao editor a disseminação do trabalho do(s) autor(es) na sua máxima extensão, o(s) autor(es) deverá(ão) assinar uma Declaração de Cedência dos Direitos de Propriedade (Copyright). O acordo de transferência, (Transfer Agreement), transfere a propriedade do artigo do(s) autor(es) para a Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia.
Se o artigo contiver extractos (incluindo ilustrações) de, ou for baseado no todo ou em parte em outros trabalhos com copyright (incluindo, para evitar dúvidas, material de fontes online ou de intranet), o(s) autor(es) tem(êm) de obter, dos proprietários dos respectivos copyrights, autorização escrita para reprodução desses extractos do(s) artigo(s) em todos os territórios e edições e em todos os meios de expressão e línguas. Todas os formulários de autorização devem ser fornecidos aos editores quando da entrega do artigo.
