Biliary Surgery During Residency: A Nationwide Study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.1071

Keywords:

Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures, Cholangiography, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/education, Clinical Competence, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Graduate, Internship and Residency

Abstract

Introduction: Biliary surgeries present a challenge in general surgery training. Increased exposure to laparoscopic techniques, coupled with a decline in experience with open procedures and more complex biliary interventions, has become a point of concern for general surgery residency programs. The objectives of this article are to assess the biliary surgery experience of general surgery residents across Portugal, compare it with the training in other Western countries, and evaluate differences between the curricula of residents trained in central hospitals and those in district hospitals.
Methods: An analysis was conducted using data from an online questionnaire administered to general surgery residents in Portugal in 2023.
Results: Out of 93 residents with more than one year of experience, 63 were in their final three years of residency (68%). The majority were from district hospitals (61, 66%). While 88 residents had assisted in an open cholecystectomy, only 63 (72%) had performed one, with most being in their final years of training. Only 28 residents (32%) felt confident in performing this procedure. 88 residents had performed a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 59 (67%) completed more than 20, including two residents in their second year (R2Y). Fifty­ ‑seven residents had converted a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and 8 were unable to complete the surgery. In cases requiring conversion, most residents employed a “fundus­ ‑first” technique. When faced with a challenging laparoscopic case, 10 residents (11%) would choose to convert, while 60 (64%) preferred performing a laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy, and 23 (25%) favored the laparoscopic “fundus­ ‑first” approach. Thirty­ ‑four residents had performed intraoperative cholangiograms, with 32 (94%) doing so electively. Seventeen residents had performed biliary tree exploration, and 9 had performed a biliodigestive anastomosis. All respondents agreed on the need for further training in biliary surgery.
Conclusion: There is widespread concern about the lack of experience with cholangiography and bile duct exploration, highlighting the need for practical training tools to improve residents’ proficiency in these critical areas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Riccardi M, Dughayli M, Baidoun F. Open Cholecystectomy for the New Learner-Obstacles and Challenges. JSLS. 2021;25(2).
2. Morgenstern L. Carl Langenbuch and the first cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1992 May;6(3):113–4.
3. Polychronidis A, Laftsidis P, Bounovas A, Simopoulos C. Twenty years of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Philippe Mouret--March 17, 1987. JSLS. 2008;12(1):109–11.
4. Zaman JA, Singh TP. The emerging role for robotics in cholecystectomy: the dawn of a new era? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2018 Feb;7(1):21–8.
5. Kadakia N, Malek K, Lee SK, Lee EJ, Burruss S, Srikureja D, et al. Impact of Robotic Surgery on Residency Training for Herniorrhaphy and Cholecystectomy. Am Surg. 2020 Oct 25;86(10):1318–23.
6. Shinozuka K, Turuda S, Fujinaga A, Nakanuma H, Kawamura M, Matsunobu Y, et al. Artificial intelligence software available for medical devices: surgical phase recognition in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7444–52.
7. Vedula SS, Ghazi A, Collins JW, Pugh C, Stefanidis D, Meireles O, et al. Artificial Intelligence Methods and Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Metrics for Surgical Education: A Multidisciplinary Consensus. J Am Coll Surg. 2022 Jun 1;234(6):1181–92.
8. Morris MX, Fiocco D, Caneva T, Yiapanis P, Orgill DP. Current and future applications of artificial intelligence in surgery: implications for clinical practice and research. Front Surg. 2024;11:1393898.
9. Madani A, Namazi B, Altieri MS, Hashimoto DA, Rivera AM, Pucher PH, et al. Artificial Intelligence for Intraoperative Guidance: Using Semantic Segmentation to Identify Surgical Anatomy during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2022 Aug 1;276(2):363–9.
10. Golany T, Aides A, Freedman D, Rabani N, Liu Y, Rivlin E, et al. Artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec 1;36(12):9215–23.
11. Ballantyne GH. The pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery: challenges for robotics and telerobotic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002 Feb;12(1):1–5.
12. The Southern Surgeons Club, Moore MJ, Bennett CL. The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg [Internet]. 1995 Jul 1 [cited 2024 Sep 15];170(1):55–9. Available from: http://www.americanjournalofsurgery.com/article/S0002961099802529/fulltext
13. Hernandez J, Ross S, Morton C, McFarlin K, Dahal S, Golkar F, et al. The Learning Curve of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site (LESS) Cholecystectomy: Definable, Short, and Safe. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Nov;211(5):652–7.
14. Richardson MC, Bell G, Fullarton GM. Incidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 5913 cases. West of Scotland Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Audit Group. Br J Surg. 1996 Oct;83(10):1356–60.
15. Cullinan DR, Schill MR, DeClue A, Salles A, Wise PE, Awad MM. Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery: Not Only for Senior Residents. J Surg Educ. 2017;74(6):e51–4.
16. Thomaschewski M, Kist M, Zimmermann M, Benecke C, Kalff JC, Krüger CM, et al. Conception and prospective multicentric validation of a Robotic Surgery Training Curriculum (RoSTraC) for surgical residents: from simulation via laboratory training to integration into the operation room. J Robot Surg. 2024 Dec 1;18(1).
17. Chan KM, Hsu J Te, Yeh CN, Yeh T Sen, Lee WC, Lien HY. Application of mentorship program for another aspect of surgical residency training: The importance of academia in surgical training. Medicine (United States). 2021 Aug 13;100(32):E26939.
18. Binkley J, Bukoski AD, Doty J, Crane M, Barnes SL, Quick JA. Surgical Simulation: Markers of Proficiency. J Surg Educ. 2019;76(1):234–41.
19. Cortez AR, Winer LK, Katsaros GD, Kassam AF, Shah SA, Diwan TS, et al. Resident Operative Experience in Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery: Exposing the Divide. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2020 Apr 1;24(4):796–803.
20. Daee SS, Flynn JC, Jacobs MJ, Mittal VK. Analysis and implications of changing hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) case loads in general surgery residency training for HPB surgery accreditation. HPB. 2013 Dec;15(12):1010–5.
21. Ledezma Dominguez J, Tariq N, Martins RS, Jawad G, Fisher AD, Maqbool B. Bailout Surgery for Difficult Gallbladders: Surgical Approach and Outcomes. Am Surg. 2024 Jun;90(6):1324–9.
22. Ravendran K, Elmoraly A, Kagiosi E, Henry CS, Joseph JM, Kam C. Converting From Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy to Open Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review of Its Advantages and Reasoning. Cureus. 2024 Jul;16(7):e64694.
23. Punnen S, Taheri S, Chen L, Scott T, Karimuddin A. Comparing resident operative volumes for routine general surgery cases at academic, urban community, and rural training sites. Canadian Journal of Surgery. 2024 Jul 1;67(4):E273–4.
24. Chung RS, Wojtasik L, Pham Q, Chari V, Chen P. The decline of training in open biliary surgery: effect on the residents’ attitude toward bile duct surgery. Surg Endosc. 2003 Feb;17(2):338–40; discussion 341.
25. Sirinek KR, Willis R, Schwesinger WH. Who Will Be Able to Perform Open Biliary Surgery in 2025? J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jul;223(1):110–5.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-31

Issue

Section

Original Papers